Sunday, 1 March 2015

Language and Power (Text analysis)

Q) With reference to text CC and relevant ideas from language study, explore how language is used to assert power.


The way language is used to assert power is shown heavily throughout the entirety of text CC- a transcript of a speech (presumably a phone call) between two females. In this Text, Fairclough’s strategy is shown persistently as there is a clear dominant [participant J] who dominates the speech by her assumed and suggested tone of voice and bold on record strategy, as well as the way she approaches [participant M] in terms of flouting conversational strategies such as greetings, which immediately suggests an unequal encounter as this can sometimes be deemed as ‘socially rude’. Additionally the way that [P-J] flouts [P-M]’s greeting; “Maureen (.) hold on a mo” can be seen as a face threatening act as [P-M]’s status is automatically lowered. Additionally, there is more than one use of competitive overlap lead by [P-J]. The use of these competitive interruptions are a clear way to assert power and bring the conversational power back to [P-J] when it seems to be getting more equal between the pair. These competitive overlaps are often followed with a suggested aggressive tone from [P-J], who is then answered to by [P-M] who uses suggested nervous unvoiced paused and ‘stuttered’ fillers in response to her other party. Not only this but [P-M] also uses repair to stop herself from saying something that [P-J] might see as face threatening for herself which may cause conflict. For example; [P-M]:”We can’t go (.) unless you ask that guy you know (.) do you (.) can you?” [P-J]: “I don’t know (.) he’s like really busy (…)” Although both the participants use regular unvoiced pauses, the reason for use is obviously different as it seems as if [P-M] is using an unintentional negative face strategy as [P-j] is continuously bold on record, therefore concluding that [P-J]’s unvoiced pauses are possibly only used to intimidate [P-M]. Whilst [P-M]’s unvoiced pauses are possibly used because she feels intimidated and so has to think about her response before it is said to avoid any possible conflict. Throughout the Text, there is only one circumstance where [P-M] has more power. This is shown where [P-J] is waiting to hear whether [P-M] has “got the tickets?” and although [P-M] responds in such a way where [P-J] still has all the conversational power, there could’ve been several ways in which she could’ve responded, which could have changed the way in which the conversation was lead altogether. 

1 comment:

  1. Great ideas - too many to pack into one paragraph. Plan how you are going to establish Julianne's power over several paragraphs and identify techniques that she uses consistently e.g. interruptions/competetive overlap or that could be connected e.g. Maureen's lower status that could be pointed to by a number of different non-fluency features. Then make sure each paragraph has a focus that is explored PEE plus context, in detail, using terminology and tentative, evaluative reference to theory.

    You can refer to them as M and J if the transcript abbreviates the names that way. It is bald not bold, on-record.

    Great start though.

    ReplyDelete