Texts A, B and D are all strong
inclusions in the first group of persuasive language techniques I am going to
explore. Text A is packaging for ‘Matchmakers’ by Quality Street; (a popular UK
chocolate brand). The overall appearance of the text that is used on the packaging
is immediately eye catching, which would instantaneously make potential buyers
more persuaded to pick up the product than if the typography (and packaging) was
not audacious or colourful. The linguistics used in this text includes informal
adjectives to describe the product such as; “YUMMY” and “DELICIOUS” rather than
the possible alternative of simply describing the product for what it is; [Honey
comb flavour chocolate]. The use of these adjectives clearly accommodates to
the consumers for this product which could possibly be anyone who is younger or
perhaps has younger children as all the language included are commonly used adjectives
and are easily readable. This is also shown in its mention of social networking
opportunities for the audience to ‘Like on Facebook’, which is socially deemed
as a younger and more modern thing to do. Additionally, the persistent use of capitalising
the most ‘important’ persuasive language, allows the target buyers to be subconsciously
persuaded to believe that the product is indefinitely all of the adjectives mentioned
above. Both the language and the typography where it is used easily persuades the
audience to buy the product because it is bold, informal and perceives itself
as an “approachable and friendly” product for a large audience by using a
certain type of tonal language choice over the entirety of the packaging. Text
B is another packaging for a food brand ‘Jaffa Cakes’ by Mcvitie’s. This
packaging uses a similar technique to Text A, in terms of bold typography and
informal adjectives such as; “CRACKELY CHOCOLATE” and “THE SMASHING ORANGEY BIT”
to perceive itself as a friendly and approachable product and to persuade the
consumers to want to buy it for these mentioned traits. However, B uses a
significantly less daring technique in the way it uses font. But this may be
because the use of the word “ORIGINAL” persuades the audience to buy the
product because it is a ‘classical’ and ‘original’ product in itself and a
product that everyone knows about already. It may also be because the brand may
be accommodating to a wider audience than text A. Therefore the typography needn’t
be too brash or too big. As well as Text A, Text B includes a social networking
option but instead uses a more communal phrase; “Join us at fb/jaffacakes.” This may persuade the audience to actually ‘join
them’ on a network because of its social and communal meaning which allows for
the target audience to then again be wider by accommodating to more individuals,
all of which have different interests. My last Text, Text D is a transcript (of
a speech), which seemingly took place inside of a local newsagents between two
people; the customer and the employee. In terms of persuasive language, person B
(the employee) has to be able to persuade person A (the customer) to want to return
and buy more produce. This is clearly shown throughout the transcript as person
B is persistently friendly and uses persistent informal language to attempt to
form a type of ‘acquaintance bond’ between both of them. It is especially noticeable
when B says’ “I’m not getting much right today [laughs]” as this is of a
significantly more relaxed tone than there would be if there was only silence
or a demand from ether person. Additionally, person B is mostly using self-deprecating
language to subconsciously make the person A feel more superior which could
possible persuade him to return as they may feel like they’re getting good
customer service as person B wants to meet their every need.
No comments:
Post a Comment